I hate the whole publicly traded model of companies. I hate capitalism. But have to engage in trading stocks (I mostly do Mutual Funds and a small quantity of direct stocks) so that my money doesn’t lose value by sitting in a bank or cash.

Same thing with credit cards, don’t like taking loans and getting marked on a centralised list for that but it’s a safer option than using your own money.

Fortunately I don’t do crypto so that’s a plus.

  • Vampire [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Saying “I wish capitalism didn’t exist” isn’t praxis.

    We’ve got to work with the world as she exists.

  • CthulhusIntern [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel better about credit cards when I pay my balance and full and every time I use cash back, knowing that I’m not causing them to make any money, and I’m actually costing them some money.

    • jackmarxist [any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah pretty much how I use them. But I’m pretty sure they earn money from every transaction or the whole thing would not exist.

  • farting_weedman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t beat yourself up. The fractional harm that your meager efforts to not get wiped the fuck out by inflation cause is comparable to every other type of consumption under capitalism.

    You have to live and living means participating in your society. When does that effort to continue existing cross over into the lying and self dealing that, for example, people into effective altruism are famous for?

    I don’t know where that line is, but you’ll figure it out.

  • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    A lot of normal workers here have 401ks and other retirement plans, and usually that involves stock trading, either by the worker or by the company holding the money. Hell, even banks gamble with your money when it sits in their accounts. And the HYSAs are high yield because some poor guy got finessed by the interest rates. And more than likely, that money is going to a bunch of weapons companies while sitting around.

    Maybe I’m just coping because I have some money invested in ETFs and some of the larger percentages go to shit like Lockheed and I don’t want to think of myself as bad. But I don’t know. I don’t touch those ETFs once I buy them so they function no different than a bank account. Maybe even worse because there are penalties for selling.

    The only thing that will redeem me is if my retirement money in the ETFs tank significantly. It will be fully deserved for willingly giving my money to Silicon Valley and weapons companies that enable genocide.

    The other option is to manually choose the stocks, but would that be worse? You would become obsessed with stock performance and constantly checking the news and potentially becoming reactionary when your value goes down. At least with ETFs I buy and forget and can focus on the real world and try to negate my contribution to evil.

  • leftofthat [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trading stocks on speculation is just gambling against the random nature of the market. It’s no different than going to a blackjack table and can be fun (also dangerous and addicting). You’re not engaging in capitalism you’re engaging in a game with other players (traders).

    Owning stocks like in a 401k investment account is different. I won’t do it. At least with pensions (i.e. a pension fund) you could gain some sort of political purpose through its corporate and government investments. This led to famous instances of corruption, as well, but it still demonstrates the political power of the investment.

    The 401k destroyed that. It’s now just all of the rent seeking with none of the voice. Pure liberalism. They’re literally passing laws in states right now that make it ILLEGAL to consider what you’re investing in and if it’s an ethical business or not.

    Saying that you have to invest in stocks or else you’ll lose money is like saying you have to vote for Biden or else you’ll lose rights. I don’t really give a shit if you do either, and your personal situation is something I don’t know about. But both should make you feel dirty, yes.

    Owning stocks isn’t just existing under capitalism. This isn’t treat discourse. You’re not buying an Xbox that someone was exploited into making. When you own a stock, you are the capitalist. Owning part of the company gives you a part of what’s taken from the employees or others, directly. A lot of common retirement investment is with large funds that own real estate. When you get your 5% return on your investment it’s not just magically growing on a tree. It’s coming from rents.

    There’s no functional difference to buying a $200,000 apartment and renting it out as a landlord or putting $200,000 in a 401k managed retirement fund that owns several hundred apartments buildings. And they do.

    There are more ethical ways to invest money than owning stocks.

    • Ufot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe you can enlighten me on more ethical ways to invest my money because at this point I think not putting money into a 401k is a terrible financial decision.

      Tax deferred compounding interest is too good of a deal for the average person to pass up. Over 30 years you’ll be looking at anywhere from 100-150% return on investment.

      $50 a paycheck for 30 years with 5% avg return turns your $39k total contributions into $100k in retirement savings. $100 turns $78k in total contributions into $200k savings.

      For many people who find saving difficult, me included, being able to set it and forget it, plus the understanding it needs to be for retirement to get the full return, has allowed me to save money I would have spent/wasted otherwise.

      Due to the compounding factor, the sooner a person starts the better the return, so to discourage young people to not put money into a 401k is IMO actively harmful.

      IMO It’s like telling someone they shouldn’t have health insurance. Yeah it’s bullshit that society forces us to participate in a fucked up system but not having it puts future you at a terrible risk.

      • leftofthat [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Just to clarify: a 401k is just a savings account that is tax deferred. By itself that doesn’t make any money or interest. Most people then take that money and have it invested. That’s what I’m commenting on.

        The return in a 401k is from (typically) a managed fund or an index fund. It’s a good return, as you note. That’s because it’s largely from rent extraction.

        It’s a great deal if you are ok with functionally owning a small apartment in some other state where a family pays half their paycheck so that you get your 5% return on investment. But know that is what is happening.

        The whole “I have no other choice” position is past any point I’m trying to make. I don’t know anyone’s specific situation.

        • Ufot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          What are ethical ways people could/should invest their money into instead?

          I’m not going to ever be a landlord, but I want to retire at the point.

    • Juice [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Individual, alienated, consumer decisions are ethical? This is what happens when no class analysis. Landlords aren’t bad because they make money from rents. Landlords are bad because their interests align with the interests of the ruling class, and they oppose the interests of the working class, who they exploit as a class. the contingent material realities of owning property for the sole purpose of getting personal income has the effect of changing peoples beliefs and behaviors. The system warps their worldview and pits them against the workers, but it is the system that benefits one class by exploiting another that is the enemy, not individual landlords. It is the system that alienates and exploits.

      There are undoubtedly evil, unethical people who are drawn to real estate and speculation, and I would have serious reservations calling the bourgeois capitalist executive of some giant real estate development/property management company a “good person.” But an individual owner of a 200k property (which is essentially nothing, a tiny house far from any urban area), which may have come to them through a lifetime of earnings, or just lucked into it or inherited it from a family member, is not by default a class enemy or individually ontologically evil. They may become that, though owning a single small property wouldn’t produce much income; forcing them to either sell or expand with the market.

      I really don’t see the point of lecturing somebody over a fucking 401k. Must be nice living in a perfectly hermetically sealed ethical bubble, into which no evil ever permeates. People out here calling themselves leftists while recreating the underlying logic of religious purity politics.

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I would at least sympathize with the idea that in a worthwhile society someone who has served the country their entire life deserves a dignified retirement funded by people of working age. Insofar as that goes, the money in a 401k doesn’t grow on trees, but it’s still a reasonable way to appropriate the funds theoretically.

        • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Social security is not sufficient to provide for a retiree on its own, and assuming the bourgeois vampires in Congress won’t kill it completely is a huge gamble.

          • leftofthat [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            They’re destroying social security because it’s good and it works, yes. I’m not telling anyone to gamble on it being around.

                • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  What’s that have to do with social security?

                  debatebro-l

                  Love to pretend not to understand the context of my conversations so I can score debate points or something.

                  For working class Americans, there are 3 options:

                  1. 401k
                  2. Try to rely on social security exclusively, in spite of the fact that it’s both insufficient and likely to disappear, realize this is nonsensical and move to 3
                  3. Work until you drop dead

                  Just want to be sure, you think everyone who isn’t independently wealthy should just do 3), because doing 1) is immoral? Do you feel I’m misrepresenting your position here? It’s easy to get misinterpreted in text so I want to be 100% sure that you’re not saying something else.

  • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    you live by others labour , it is dirty .

    and it will always be Dirty … there is no escape to the Fact that you live Parasiticlly from other peoples Labour … the ONLY avenue you have is the Avenue of Hirachy and Elitism.

    You can start to consider yourself much more important then those that labour … Of better Ideology …Birth … Culture …Race … Personal Biographie etc…

    When you do that it will not feel so dirty anymore . but you will be then Dirty for others. So no escape from the Dirt without Abandoning Passiv income.

    EDIT: Also you reduce it … like a Hole Factory / Company all its Employees , there dreams and Hopes … compressed into this crudes form.

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      He’s not living off other people’s labour. He’s using it as a bank, cutting out the bank in the middle to maintain above inflation rates of interest.

      If you’re using a bank the bank is doing the exact same thing putting your money in stocks too.

  • If I were you, I’d rather just keep the money itself as is, not trading stocks or using credit cards…

    I honestly have no experience with that sort of thing and rather not go through the mental gymnastics to do so, regardless of how my money depreciates and how safe using credit cards is…

    I’d just want a simple life… don’t want to overcomplicate shit as I do…

    • jackmarxist [any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I get it but it’s simply not feasible. Every rupee I earn will be devalued continuously. The government in my country has also brought in massive inflation since 2014 and it only gets worse as the currency is weakening and the country is being sold off to capitalists.