• Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well obviously Lemmy would say this, but a single seat is meaningless. Even 13 (if true) means they don’t exactly have a huge amount of power.

    • flamingos-cantM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem is the trend. Reform growing means that the Tories will likely go (even further) right to meet them. Farage is already eyeing up becoming leader the Conservatives.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think the main issue the tories lost wasn’t because of a sudden trend towards leftism, but because of how ridiculously corrupt they became

      • wewbull
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Do you care that the DUP has seats?

        No, reform will be equally meaningless.

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Not really comparable since the DUP is constrained to Northern Ireland and never even considers entering mainland UK. The Conservative party, Labour party and Lib Dems rarely run in Northern Ireland if ever, so the parties don’t have to worry about them. Reform is UK-Wide and actively snatched votes from the Tories.

          • wewbull
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The DUP propped up May’s government which put through Brexit. They take their seats and speak in debates. They have an effect, but not much of one with so few seats, and Reform is on a similar number. They will be a similar small voice in Westminster.

            The vote share is a different issue. Some Tories will be looking at that longingly, but I suspect they would alienate more than they’d recruit if they actually shifted in that direction.

            • Flax
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I mean it’s still to do with competition. Whenever smaller parties get a larger vote share, they influence the larger parties. That’s basically how Brexit happened with UKIP

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not necessarily. Obviously the majority of the seats are going to Labour. Those are the voters they need to win back. They’re not going to do that by appealing to Reform voters.

        • flamingos-cantM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Labour is winning so many seats because Reform is splitting the right vote. The Tories did so well in 2019 because Reform agreed not to field any candidates to stop Corbyn.

    • mecfs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      its not about 13 seats. They got more than half the vote share the conservatives had. If the conservatives wanna win that voteshare back, they are gonna need to move even further right, which is worrying.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not that easy. Such a move could alienate more moderate voters, causing them to lose even more to labour.