One in four children are due to start school in September without being toilet trained, a charity has said.

A report by early years charity Kindred found pupils are losing, on average, a third of their learning time each day due to teachers diverting away from teaching and towards supporting children who are not school-ready.

Bristol charity ERIC - the children’s bladder and bowel organisation - has now set up an “emergency intervention” campaign for those starting school next month.

ERIC CEO Juliette Rayner said that, while the problem had been a “growing issue” recently, “this year seems to be particularly bad”.

  • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    What do they mean by school? What age are these children?

    Where I’m from, the typical age to potty train is 2-4 years, so 25% at age 6-7 sounds very high.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Who in their right mind forces their kid into the hellscape that is school at 4 years old?? How to fuck up your kids social and mental developement 101 much?

          • blackn1ght
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 months ago

            Compulsory school age is 5, but most start in reception at 4. I do agree though that it’s far too young. People will look at you with three heads though if you suggest it’s too young here though.

            • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              3 months ago

              It is more about having a place to dump your child for the day. Especially true since no family can get by without dual incomes and extended social support has broken down completely.

              • Mrkawfee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Also reception isn’t anywhere near as formal as Year 1. It’s pretty much an extension of the nursery experience which many children will have given the need for both parents to work.

                • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I myself have called it “a place to dump your child”, but in reality even nursery is early years education. The real purpose of these places was meant to be education. Many politicians do think of nursery (and school!) primarily as a place to keep kids busy with little regard for quality of learning.

          • loutr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            “School” starts at 3 in France. But it’s more like a kindergarten for 3 years, then you enter primary school at 6 where you learn reading and writing.

          • Flax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            The British.

            I started at 3.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      The concern is over “Pandemic babies” who would be hitting 4 this year and entering Reception class at the end of the summer holidays before starting primary school the following year.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      6-7 is really old to be using diapers for a developmentally normal child.