• MexOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I tend to agree, they even still own them

  • rayquetzalcoatl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    oh no, property developers can’t afford to bribe the council? oh nooo oh noooo I feel so bad, think about all the predatory landlords that are missing out on somebody else’s income oh nooooo

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I see you didn’t read the article. The landlords have gotten their buildings, it’s the local community that’s getting screwed since those funds were earmarked for local improvements.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No, the money isn’t for the council members it’s “to provide facilities to a community following a development in the area.” Developments that are needed as a consequence of the new housing.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. “That’s cool you can owe us”
    2. wait
    3. put a monster fucking lien on the next thing the dev does, for unpaid debt.