• jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    And what happens to people that earn more than a MP? Lots of qualified people earn more than than a MP, so they would need to self exclude, develop political aspirations that would make up the loses (read consider corruption), or sacrifice their personal wellbeing to serve in parliament.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      They could refuse, continue doing their job on the side, or just take the temporary pay cut to enjoy a close to do nothing job for a few years. I don’t think that’s anything to be concerned about. An MP gets over £90000 plus expenses, that’s triple the median salary. If those that earn more want to self select themselves out of power, they can definitely do that. That’s only about 4% of the population.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          https://uk.indeed.com/career/software-engineer/salaries https://uk.indeed.com/career/surgeon/salaries

          I don’t think you realise how much £91000 + expenses actually is in the UK.

          And currently the house of Lords is a bunch of old geezers that don’t know anything about anything, so yeah, taxi drivers and farmers would be a welcome change. They actually talk to normal people once in a while.

          And again, if they feel like serving the public when shaping policy about their profession is important enough, they should be happy to take a pay cut for a few years for the greater good.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            And currently the house of Lords is a bunch of old geezers that don’t know anything about anything

            Look, I’m not British and frankly do think the Lords is silly. But I can name three members of the House of Lords, and 2 of them at least demonstrably deserve to be there on political merit, whether or not you agree with how they vote. I have no idea what the ratio is across the whole of the Lords, but at least not all of them “don’t know anything about anything”.

            Don’t get me wrong, I prefer the Australian model where Senators are elected with a proportional system and serve for terms twice as long as lower house MPs. And the Canadian model of “lifetime” (subject to retirement age) appointments also has merit. It’s just that not ever single Lord is completely undeserving.

            The three Lords that I’m familiar with, fwiw, are David Cameron, David Willetts, and Andrew Lloyd Webber.