• Jaderick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    So what’s controversial about it? This Sky News / Comcast rag mentions it’s “enormously” controversial without stating the controversies.

    After reading about Tortoise media I’m kinda liking the slow news movement.

    • OrlandoDoom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Article says “scores” of journalists went on strike, I guess that’s what they mean by that. “Scores” is a bit of a loaded term imo, it sounds like loads but a score is only 20

      • frazorth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        These things can be confusing to understand and seems like a reasonable question, I don’t pretend to fully understand everyone’s complaints.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortoise_Media

        Doing basic research shows it as “a British news website”, founded by a British journalist (who Murdoch didn’t like so already sounds like a nice guy) and former head of the BBC, and an American who spent 4 years here as Ambassador under Obama.

        Not exactly sounding like Bezos or Murdoch levels of evil here.

        The main issue is that its all been dealt with in secret, consultations with Observer employees such as the editor haven’t taken place so its just leaving a sour taste, along with a lot of questions as to how they reached contradictory positions on why they should sell the paper.

        https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/dec/09/key-questions-about-the-sale-of-the-observer-that-remain-unanswered

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Apart from anything else nobody wants British institutions sold to American multinationals, only bad things can possibly come of that.