There are a number of changes the UK needs to make, but are completely unsellable to the public. We’ve seen the backlash from cutting WFA for the wealthy, now imagine trying to tackle the growing problems that are the triple lock, massively increasing elderly social care costs, massively increasing elderly medical costs. Any party that makes the hard decisions to change that will 100% be voted out for the foreseeable future.
I genuinely think the only way to have a massive shake-up is if the UK needs a bailout and certain conditions are forced upon us.
It simply won’t happen otherwise, because no party will accept being unelectable for 20+ years in order to improve things in the future (to the benefit of their competitor), but cause pain in the present (to the harm of themselves). I’m honestly shocked Labour even went for WFA.
I genuinely think the only way to have a massive shake-up is if the UK needs a bailout and certain conditions are forced upon us.
I totally agree.
no party will accept being unelectable for 20+ years in order to improve things in the future
Also totally agree. Not to mention that if it’s either Labour or the Tories they will spend their time in office dismantling everything their predecessor set up.
IMO the WFA backlash was mostly a media thing though. I haven’t heard anyone in real life complain about it. I think Labour did a bad job of defending the rise in employer’s NI too. I haven’t heard any of them mention the fact that people on minimum wage (which will be going up soon) are obviously protected, the fact that employers have other options besides cutting wages to absorb the cost of it (like paying out less dividends) or that small businesses are exempt. I think Labour are down in the polls because they are basically getting spit roasted on one end by capital interests and the media because they are Labour and on the other end by the people for not being bold enough to meaningfully change anything.
There are a number of changes the UK needs to make, but are completely unsellable to the public. We’ve seen the backlash from cutting WFA for the wealthy, now imagine trying to tackle the growing problems that are the triple lock, massively increasing elderly social care costs, massively increasing elderly medical costs. Any party that makes the hard decisions to change that will 100% be voted out for the foreseeable future.
I genuinely think the only way to have a massive shake-up is if the UK needs a bailout and certain conditions are forced upon us.
It simply won’t happen otherwise, because no party will accept being unelectable for 20+ years in order to improve things in the future (to the benefit of their competitor), but cause pain in the present (to the harm of themselves). I’m honestly shocked Labour even went for WFA.
I totally agree.
Also totally agree. Not to mention that if it’s either Labour or the Tories they will spend their time in office dismantling everything their predecessor set up.
IMO the WFA backlash was mostly a media thing though. I haven’t heard anyone in real life complain about it. I think Labour did a bad job of defending the rise in employer’s NI too. I haven’t heard any of them mention the fact that people on minimum wage (which will be going up soon) are obviously protected, the fact that employers have other options besides cutting wages to absorb the cost of it (like paying out less dividends) or that small businesses are exempt. I think Labour are down in the polls because they are basically getting spit roasted on one end by capital interests and the media because they are Labour and on the other end by the people for not being bold enough to meaningfully change anything.