• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    it’s weird how an outright genocide, surprisingly recognized as such by nearly the entire world as it is happening, would cause people to voluntarily reveal themselves to be just cartoonishly evil.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    James Woods basically having Disney turn Hades into his personal self-insert character actually makes the parts of Kingdom Hearts where you beat the shit out of him that much more rewarding

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I heard about the wildfires yesterday, and thought: “ain’t it the rich people who have homes in that area?”

    :)

    :( to all the people who aren’t rich I’m sorry

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There is like 6 fires, but one is a :) fire and the other five are probably :( fires.

      • hobovision@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        All of the fires are :(

        While the palisades fire is showing a lot of very rich folks that their money doesn’t make them immune to fire, there are a lot of relatively regular people who were barely hanging on to their homes in a very expensive area who lost everything and could be financially ruined forever.

        Don’t get me wrong, vanishinlgy few of those in the palisades were poor before the fire. But a lot could be now if they were uninsured or if their insurance fucks them over.

        There’s a bunch of apartment buildings in the area that burned down too. Families who were protected by rent control lost their apartment and now where do they go?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Lots of actors whose work you appreciated lost their homes. I’m not defending rich people, but many of these folks actually earned it, not all inherited or squatted on wealth. Anthony Hopkins, Cary Elwes, John Goodman, Jeff Bridges, Billy Crystal among others lost homes. I’m sure a lot of amazing Hollywood memorabilia went up in flames too.

      E: Why the negativity? Just generic hating on rich people with no nuance? I draw the line at when people use their wealth, personally or politically, to put downward pressure on people’s wages, benefits, and quality of life, doubly so if they personally benefit from it like getting a bonus for layoffs. If you want to hate on wealth save it for the execs trying to use AI to put these people out of a job. People like Goodman walked the line to support their unions. Show a little flexibility before you throw more torches on the fire.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They all have enough to recover with ease, aside from a few lost artworks and memorabilia.

        • Delphia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Except the things that cant be replaced with money.

          Your kids first shoes, wedding photos, family heirlooms, the funny thing about rich people is that they are still people.

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Cary elwes is rich enough to you that you doubt his personhood? I have to assume his net worth is seven digits(according to those celebrity net worth sites, $6-8 million. Idk if those are at all accurate, but it feels reasonable for his career). Doctors, lawyers, dentists, accountants, plumbers, contractors, septic tank servicers, and a fuckload of other people are in that range.

              That’s a lot of people you’re not sure are people. I get that it was probably not earnest and I’m ruining the joke, but that’s too broad a dehumanization brush for me to find it funny.

              • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                6-8 Million isn’t considered rich, I’m talking about the Elon Musk “Vacations on the moon” billionaires.

                • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  43 minutes ago

                  This is in a thread talking about how Cary elwes (and others ranging from $45M-$160M, but all of them are skilled actors who work a lot) lost their homes, so you might want to specify that.

                  I don’t know if that’s even true though, we can see Elon Musk’s super immature but definitely human emotions on display. He freaked out about his trans daughter and went on an anti-woke crusade, which is depressingly common. There are definitely some ways in which he does NOT think like the rest of us and I think he’s totally lacking morals, but sometimes people are evil.

                  Edit: that said, musk doesn’t need my defense. Maybe he’s got some humanity left, maybe not. Either way, he’s an active danger to the rest of us as it is. Perhaps he wouldn’t be after aggressive (99.99%, he’d still a multimillionaire) taxes or after going to jail for corruption. Hopefully we’ll see.

                • Delphia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  42 minutes ago

                  So you arent talking about the specific rich people who did lose houses and their irreplaceable personal posessions in these fires? Your talking about Elon Musk who is completely unrelated to the topic and has lost nothing in the fires for some reason?

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    That’s unfortunate, I liked Oppenheimer. Always sucks to find out someone involved was a total dickweasel.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There’s just so many people that work on movies and finance them that there has got to be a 100℅ chance that every great movie has a dickweasle wedged in the process somewhere.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You gotta separate the art from the artist. When one of my favorite bands got canceled because the lead singer was into the young ladies, I tried to remember there were four other dudes in the band, as well as presumably a lot of behind the scenes folks who assisted with touring and studio production. Same with movies. You can denounce people for being shitty, but at the same time recognize they were a part of something great.

        • cokeslutgarbage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Lol what does “young ladies” mean here? Like teenage adults or like girl kids. If you’re talking about a child abuser, describing him as a man who is “into the young ladies” is super dishonest and makes my skin crawl. If this musician is a child abuser, don’t sugar coat your language.

          Gross!

      • aeronmelon@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        81
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Since becoming a father, I stopped using child as an insult. My child, still two, actually learns from his mistakes and feels bad when he does something wrong.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          So, you had to wait until it impacted you to realize how unfair it was?

          Just giving you shit, but as a schoolmarm I can confirm that adults are much shittier than kids

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            16 hours ago

            That’s because adults are more imaginative. My cousin who’s a total dick now as an adult, was also a total dick as a kid. He just was easier to deal with because his dickness was less sophisticated.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I think the idea is that kids often get away with being poorly behaved. But yeah I guess today, many adults do too…

            I think teenagers are the worst humans. If you were ever bullied you know what I mean. No filter on the awful things they say and not just on the Internet.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I don’t know about the guy you’re responding to but I personally stopped expecting consistency from those kinds of people a long time ago. I’m 100% confident there is at least one white guy doing exactly what you described at this very moment.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I want to purge the (British) Saxons do I count? Mostly the oligarchs and aristocrats but im sure I can find some working class ones deserving of getting fed to the woodchiper.

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    First I’ve heard of him being a dick. Adding the name to the pile.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Really? Even Family Guy has been making fun of his for his racist rants for like 20 years at this point. He’s like famously one of the biggest dipshits in Hollywood

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        TBH I thought that was part of the joke about him replacing the dog who is racist because I guess some dogs just are.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Family Guy talks a lot of smack about a lot of people I have literally never heard of, and would have to look up.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Oppenheimer has been out for a long time. It is what James Woods is most known for. Boycotting will not have much effect anymore. Maybe his next work.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It is what James Woods is most known for.

        And Matt Damon is best known for Thor: Love and Thunder?

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Sean Connery, best known for the animated film Sir Billi

          Michael J. Fox, best known for the 2023 movie “Still”

          Jaleel White best known for the game show “Flip Side”

          I can do this all day.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Oppenheimer has been out for a long time.

        If a bit over a year is a “long time” then I’m a lot older than you lol.

        It is what James Woods is most known for

        uh, whhhat? that is certainly not true. I’ve known of him for like 20 years as a (shitty) actor and had no clue he was involved with Oppenheimer whatsoever, despite seeing that movie in the theater. From IMBD:

        In some ways, the executive producer isn’t super involved anyhow. My understanding is that they just drum up money and try to persuade suits that a picture should be made. I’m sure he got paid 100 times his worth though…

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I am guessing you’re younger than me :)

            The Virgin Suicides, for example, was pretty popular and well known to me and my circle.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I doubt any of those movies are currently more known than Oppenheimer. The listed movies have James Woods participating as an actor. Whereas with Oppenheimer, James was bankrolling it. Executive producers can have more influence than producers. It depends whether they decide to be hands-on or only see the movie as an investment.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Oppenheimer may be well known, but I don’t know if anybody had any idea it was produced by James Woods. He’s not known for that movie by any stretch.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            You can see right there in the IMDB screenshot they use the same language you did (“known for”). I think IMDB has their finger on the pulse of how people talk about entertainment. Many people in the movie industry are most known for things from years ago but still work frequently. Like would you say Christopher Lloyd is most known for whatever semi-popular thing from the last couple of years he had a role in, or Back to the Future?

            You are right that EP’s vary in involvement, but even if I had known he was EP in that film, I still would’ve had the same question I originally asked.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I don’t know how much input he had into the movie, but the fact that it still included a rather large portion of Oppenheimer trying to prevent a nuclear arms race as well as being persecuted for his support for socialism and uprisings in other countries is quite ironic.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      The title executive producer can basically mean anything. It could be a studio head who approved funding for the movie but isn’t involved in production at all. Or it’s given to someone who secured the script and pitched it to a studio and did the pre production. There is no exact definition of the title. Like Steve Jobs is an executive producer on Toy Story only because he bought Pixar and funded the movie. And nowadays you often see one of the actors with an executive producer title to boost the marketing.

      • atempuser23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        as you said while there isn’t a strict definition executive producers usually provide or secure the funding independent of the production. ‘Regular’ producers are involved with the ins and outs of a movie. Though typically that is limited to how money is being spent and making sure the production vision can be executed with the budget on hand.