In his witness statement to the public inquiry, the prime minister claimed that he did “not have access” to the messages during the period running the Treasury because he had changed his phone several times and failed to back them up.
So Rishi is guilty of failing to keep records in public office, that should be a sackable offense at the very least.
If only
He went to the Ursula Von De Leyen school of text management
Failings to apply a court order is contempt.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
I don’t think this is failing to meet the court order - there are no records for him to produce. However he is supposed to be keeping records.
Not many people write a Whatsapp message to yourself. If all have been deleted then you can only assume the worst because of the obvious intent to obscure evidence.
Cool thing is that faceberg has them…
I guess they won’t comply tho like they would if sunak was not elite.
Fuck u plebs
This is the best summary I could come up with:
In his witness statement to the public inquiry, seen by the Guardian, the prime minister claimed that he did “not have access” to the messages during the period running the Treasury because he had changed his phone several times and failed to back them up.
Boris Johnson faced fierce criticism when he said that he would hand over his pandemic WhatsApp messages only once government officials assessed the safety of the device he was forced to discard in April 2021 for security reasons.
The Guardian understands, however, that Johnson has told the inquiry that he has been unable to access messages between 31 January and 7 June 2020, significant dates in the first wave of the pandemic during which thousands of people died, despite the phone being in action until the following spring.
In the former prime minister’s witness statement, he suggests that other leading players in the government at the time – which could include Sunak, Michael Gove and Matt Hancock – could hand over their phones with WhatsApp or Signal messages on them instead.
Matt Fowler, co-founder of Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice, said: “If Johnson and Sunak don’t provide the inquiry with the messages it has asked for, they need to face the full force of the law.
The high court ruled in July that the government must hand over potentially embarrassing WhatsApp and Signal messages to the inquiry, after the Cabinet Office refused to do so, saying some of the material sought was “unambiguously irrelevant”.
The original article contains 879 words, the summary contains 249 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
