• HipPriest@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Explaining why the government grant offered isn’t enough for most people to get one. Was having a conversation with people on here about heat pumps yesterday. Interesting read.

    • JohnSmith
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The government should in my view be investing much more to insulating houses, installing heat pumps, and installing solar panels with house batteries. These measures should be within reach of all households.

      • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Solar panels and batteries at the moment are paying back in about 7 years and that is without any government grant, you can potentially get it down to 5 with a bit more risk taken on with not tier 1 kit and installers. Or put another way you pay up front for the next 25 years to pay 8p a KWh (instead of ~35p).

        Comparatively I can’t make a heatpump do anything but cost more for heating over the next 25 years, it never pays off in its lifetime. An air to air heatpump however should be equivalent to a boiler but they cost about 1/3 of the to water ones which seem to be enormously overpriced compared to other countries that do something similar (Norway).

      • GreatAlbatrossOPMA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bloody tell me about it.

        I did a breakdown/digest of the new ECO+ initiative a while back.
        And while it was functionally useless for me (no allowance for DIY materials), it was definitely targeting the low hanging fruit (thermostats, loft insulation, CWI, EWI)