GreatAlbatrossMA to UK PoliticsEnglish · 9 个月前Come clean on secret taxpayer rescue plans for Thames Water, MP demandswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down10
arrow-up127arrow-down1external-linkCome clean on secret taxpayer rescue plans for Thames Water, MP demandswww.theguardian.comGreatAlbatrossMA to UK PoliticsEnglish · 9 个月前message-square5fedilink
minus-squareFuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 个月前yes, what i meant is there are no economic constraints, only political ones.
minus-squareHumanPenguinlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-29 个月前Agreed. And well worth pointing out at every oppertunity. To many in the UK have fallen for the lie that nationalisation is inherently inefficient. Without thinking beyond the right-wing properganda. if we as taxpayers and customers. Are paying more while getting less from privatised utilities. How the hell are we measuring efficency. if nayionalised utilities are failing to be efficient. They are managed by government. And are able to act exactly as a private org. Who is to blame. And who gains from creating an extra layer of privatised blame.
yes, what i meant is there are no economic constraints, only political ones.
Agreed.
And well worth pointing out at every oppertunity.
To many in the UK have fallen for the lie that nationalisation is inherently inefficient.
Without thinking beyond the right-wing properganda.
How the hell are we measuring efficency.
Who is to blame. And who gains from creating an extra layer of privatised blame.