• wewbull
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    As a long term LibDem voter, mainly because of PR, this is one of the few issues I disagree on.

    Another elected house isn’t desirable and I’m generally fine with it being a house full of experienced politicians and subject matter experts. I’d like to reform the appointment process to avoid the stuffing we’ve seen from Johnson and Truss. The Lords Spiritual should be ended as a group. I have no problem with community leaders being appointed, which may include religious leaders, but not as a fixed role in the house.

    I see all of that as fairly minor reform. Not rip it up and start again.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What if the new elected upper house worked similarly to the Australian Senate? Our House of Representatives is the same as your House of Commons (except that it uses IRV instead of the undemocratic FPTP) with single-winner districts. But the Senate uses a proportional system (STV) electing 6 Senators per state for twice the amount of time an MP is elected for. So they’re relatively less concerned about the day-to-day shifting polls than MPs are, and you get a result that’s much more representative of what the people actually want.

      In the UK context, it might be easier to sell PR in an entirely new house than it would be to update how the Commons is elected.