Snapshot of Eurozone inflation falls to 5.5% in sharp contrast to UK. Economists put reason for divergence down to Brexit and Britain’s energy price guarantee.

  • emerty
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    and Britain’s energy price guarantee

    And you’re ignoring the second half of the first paragraph?

    Why?

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not ignoring it. Of course there are other factors. But brexit is definitely a factor. Therefore: Brexit, the gift that keeps on giving.

      • emerty
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Economists said most of the reason for the divergence between the UK and the EU was down to the UK government’s energy price guarantee (EPG), which has capped the cost of gas and electricity bills to the equivalent of £2,500 a year for a typical household until July. In the eurozone there have not been similar caps fixing the price over a lengthy time period, meaning their inflation rates better reflect the recent global decline in wholesale gas and electricity prices.

      • emerty
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I work in agtech, brexit is a gift, it’s caused disruption that’s a great catalyst for investment in regenerative and vertical farming

        Problems are opportunities

        Wage growth is also high as a result of the labour squeeze that brexit is partially affecting

        • G4Z
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That seems suitably vague.

          be specific, what can you do now that you couldn’t have done in the EU and why has that caused more investment that wouldn’t have happened anyway?

          • emerty
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The CAP is an environmental disaster. The UK has now created its own agriculture policy that does not subsidise production. This was not possible whilst in the EU.

            • G4Z
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              So I suppose what you are saying is, now that the cost of food production has increased that’s made investments in these things more viable? Kind of sounds like some significant downsides for the other part of that equation. Not quite a Brexit benefit for the rest of us, just those in a specific VC funded R+D company.

              I also think… those investments could have still happened in the EU tbh, could and maybe should have been government funded research anyway, considering there is at least one large vertical farm company in Germany.

              Not really buying that as a benefit myself, but at least it is arguable!

              • emerty
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, the disruption to supply chains from covid and brexit have driven investment decisions to grow more in the UK and to use tech to replace low skill labour that wasn’t possible with FOM providing serfs to grub about in the dirt. Cheap labour is a barrier to tech. Modern slavery is a big issue in farming

                The CAP was designed to deliver cheap food during conflict, it’s failed at the first real test.

                The CAP takes the largest slice of the EU budget and the ‘modern’ farming it encourages have destroyed biodiversity and soil

                Policy to fix this has failed miserably to the tune of our entire net contribution to the budget of 66b

                https://www.arc2020.eu/cap-billions-spent-on-biodiversity-with-little-impact-auditors/

                • G4Z
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, the disruption to supply chains from covid and brexit have driven investment decisions to grow more in the UK and to use tech to replace low skill labour that wasn’t possible with FOM providing serfs to grub about in the dirt. Cheap labour is a barrier to tech. Modern slavery is a big issue in farming

                  I agree, modern slavery is an issue as is paying these workers too little these are really domestic problems though which we still have thanks to the government farm worker visa scheme importing them from the RoW anyway. Germany and Finland both have FoM and they have 2 of the top vertical farm companies (one of them even has a project in Bedford apparently. So I don’t really see how they can do it in the EU, and somehow we couldn’t?

                  The CAP was designed to deliver cheap food during conflict, it’s failed at the first real test.

                  It was designed to ensure food security and nobody has gone hungry so that’s not really true is it.

                  The CAP takes the largest slice of the EU budget and the ‘modern’ farming it encourages have destroyed biodiversity and soil

                  Natural resources including CAP, CFP and any other rural and environmental measures so that’s not really true either is it? Also, even if you do include all that, it comes second to Growth projects (38% vs 47.01%)

                  Policy to fix this has failed miserably to the tune of our entire net contribution to the budget of 66b

                  Hasn;t Brexit already cost more than our total contributions over 47 years? We were close to that according to Forbes 3 years ago.

                  https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2020/01/21/brexit-costs-close-to-matching-britains-total-eu-contributions-infographic/

                  So we’ve spent multiple times more than EU contributions would have been for the last few years to fix nothing, and stimulate an industry that is apparently already thriving within the EU.

                  Doesn’t sound like a Brexit benefit to me, it’s just loss after loss.

                  • emerty
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Infarm’s farm went bust.

                    Hasn;t Brexit already cost more than our total contributions over 47 years?

                    No

                    Even by the measure that the OBR states, GDP per capita, UK was 2nd in Europe in 2016 and is still 2nd in 2022. The economic impact has been massively overstated.

                    https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=GB-XC&start=2016

                    Investment may have been delayed, but that’s just delayed. There’s plenty of money looking at undervalued UK companies in deeptech and fintech

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m happy to hear of a positive side effect of brexit. I’m not going to lie, I think it’s the first.

      • SMURG
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        A factor, but clearly not the primary one.