Snapshot of Eurozone inflation falls to 5.5% in sharp contrast to UK. Economists put reason for divergence down to Brexit and Britain’s energy price guarantee.

  • G4Z
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The CAP has not been reformed successfully, you’re confusing task with goal

    You’ve added that qualifier not me, depends how you define success doesn’t it. My point was that things can and do change.

    Wow, if you think wasting 66b is a sign of good governance, you’re lost pal

    Heh, you know, I knew you were going to come back with this so I already have my answer to it.

    Yes 66bn certainly does sound like a lot of money to waste, over a period of 8 years and between 28 countries.

    Makes me wonder why you are not so bothered about the 200bn that this country has spent on this Brexit project, all on it’s own in the same time frame.

    Lol, those are the ones that got caught. Man, you are naive as hell

    Oh right… so now you’re pointing to the corruption that you can’t prove exists?

    Let me ask you this, what do you make of the blatant clear corruption in this country? specifically all of the pork barrel money related to Brexit like the Tees port scandal for example?

    I’d like to think you’ll be just as scathing, but somehow it seems like any cost associated with Brexit is worth it for some reason, even though you can’t even tell me specifically what that reason is, much less prove it’s a valid one. I wish I could say this was the first conversation I’ve had with somebody with Brexititus related Brexit blindness but when you get down to it, you’re all remarkably similar.

    • emerty
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol, you are like most remain voters I encounter, you like the idea of the EU, but don’t actually know anything about it. Of the 3 current federations, which one would you like the EU to become? Russia? China? USA?

      Ok. Let’s do some simple maths re wasted money

      66b wasted plus 66b opportunity cost plus 66b to redo the work that was meant to have been done. That’s 198b… And that assumes biodiversity hasn’t got worse, which it has, so it will cost more. Why do you defend failure?

      And no, the UK hasn’t spent 200b on brexit. You are demonstrating stunning levels of economic illiteracy now.

      When I present you evidence of EU incompetence and corruption, you claim this as evidence of competence and purity. 😂

      How about UVL and her disappearing texts?

      https://www.politico.eu/article/new-york-times-sue-european-union-ursula-von-der-leyen-pfizer-texts/

      And no, I won’t defend yet another power structure, I’m not a nationalist, I think all politicians have the opportunity to be corrupt, I don’t think that them being in Westminster or Brussels makes a blind bit of difference. You just prefer corruption with a nice accent and better coffee 😂.

      • G4Z
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        undefined> Lol, you are like most remain voters I encounter, you like the idea of the EU, but don’t actually know anything about it. Of the 3 current federations, which one would you like the EU to become? Russia? China? USA?

        Mate one of the first posts you made on this contained 2 factually incorrect statements and none of your links have backed up your claims.

        If me pointing this out makes me a typical remain voter, well I suppose that shows just how much more informed we are than you typically Brexit blind types.

        66b wasted plus 66b opportunity cost plus 66b to redo the work that was meant to have been done. That’s 198b…

        Oh well in that case, £200 bn lost, plus 200bn to re do all that work when we do eventually join and then another eleventy billion for things I made up just like you.

        And no, the UK hasn’t spent 200b on brexit. You are demonstrating stunning levels of economic illiteracy now.

        OBR says otherwise.

        You’ve already demonstrated you’re willing to make incorrect statements (charitable) and unsupported claims, bit rich to be saying anything about others literacy.

        When I present you evidence of EU incompetence and corruption, you claim this as evidence of competence and purity.

        I never said that though.

        I said

        ’ I think those are both fantastic examples of accountability’ which is an entirely different statment

        Do you always make up these straw men to knock down,do you think putting words in your debate opponents mouth is a god way to argue? You are simply incapable of responding to the actual point that’s been stated or something?

        I’m not a nationalist,

        You voted for fucking Brexit mate, and you’re defending it. If you aren’t a nationalist, you’re in bed getting fleas off them.

        Honestly, you ‘lexiters’ are more deluded than the most red faced sun reading UKIPers.

          • G4Z
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, the OBR says 4% GDP loss per year.

            3.1 trillion per year GDP, let’s make it 5% just to make it easy

            150 billion per year, x 2+ years, it’s well over 200bn.

            Bloomberg also agrees

            https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-31/brexit-is-costing-the-uk-100-billion-a-year-in-lost-output

            So, you going to accept this fact then? or is it going to be fingers in ears?

            Your Google fu sucks as does your critical thinking skills

            What is this supposed to prove?

            I’m saying, they have 2 of the largest companies in the world you’ve pointed to a company with 34 employees and 2 farms (1 in construction) In farm in Germany has 422 employees (source linkedin for both) so it’s 10 times as big a company as the one you linked.

            Yes, I did vote for it. Very happy with it. Guess it just sucks to be you

            Haha, yeah I can tell, you won’t accept reality, you can’t accept you’ve made a huge mistake, you can’t handle the truth!

            Like I said, you’re all remarkably gullible, I mean similar.

            • emerty
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Lol, the OBR said 4% of GDP per CAPITA OVER 15 YEARS

              LOL, YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOURE TALKING ABOUT 😂😂😂😂

              • G4Z
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lol, the OBR said 4% of GDP per CAPITA OVER 15 YEARS

                Mate, firstly.

                Calm down.

                Secondly, you’re wrong, it is GDP not GDP per capita and it is at least 200bn.

                These are facts, accept the facts.

                  • G4Z
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No it’s GDP, you are simply wrong, confidently wrong I will grant you, but wrong.

                    Tell me genius, what’s the measure for long term productivity growth the OBR uses here?

                    https://obr.uk/box/productivity-growth-long-term/

                    Oh right, look at that, it’s GDP.

                    I mean, are you saying Bloomberg is also wrong?

                    Again, resorting to insults just shows up your immaturity and the fact that you’ve lost this debate.

      • G4Z
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yet again I go to read your link to see what you are talking about and yet again it’s not what you say.

        Okay so the NYT wants to read the texts, how does that show evidence of ‘corruption’?

        I mean, maybe we will see them and something will be uncovered, but as of right now you have nothing. If she’s corrupt then I hope they throw the book at her. You’ve not provided any evidence for your claim though. Again.

          • G4Z
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh yeah, Turkish state media site that doesn’t even load and talks about Breitbart’s opinion, cracking source. Yeah, that I won’t accept, give me a reputable source.

            You are literally googling for any old shit to support your nonsensical position.

              • G4Z
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Firstly, no need for insults.

                I’m debating you in good faith, and I am smashing you to bits quite frankly and it’s not even difficult, it’s easy. Respond with better arguments and stop lying to yourself and you may be less upset.

                Secondly, again that story is not what you said it is. It’s allegations and it’s not even EU related it’s from back when she was German defence minister.

                Now I already told you, I don’t agree with corruption, I’d throw the book at her if there’s any truth to it and it were down to me.

                Any institution over time will have examples of corruption, from the top right down to local councils and the church raffle. It’s a very human problem that occurs everywhere. The important thing is how you deal with it, and as far as I can see the first case they dealt with it very well (arrests and prosecutions) and in the second case that’s clearly something for the German government to do something about.

                Then I look at the UK, these idiots you voted to give all the power too, day after day there are stories and evidence about corruption on absolutely incredible scale, literally billions stolen, 200 billion at least wasted on this pile of shit…

                • emerty
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lol, smashing. You haven’t got a clue pal.

                  There you go again, defending failure

                  I didn’t vote for those idiots, moron.

                  • G4Z
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Of course ‘I have a clue’, as far as I’m concerned I’ve demolished you and you’ve got nothing. That’s why you’ve resorted to insults.

                    You’re defending Brexit (badly), the very definition of defending failure.