- cross-posted to:
- nottheonion@zerobytes.monster
- cross-posted to:
- nottheonion@zerobytes.monster
“Now is not the time for blame”, the Conservative activist and journalist Annunziata Rees-Mogg suggested to her colleagues at the start of the ‘Popular Conservatism’ conference on Tuesday.
It was not a suggestion which any of them seemed willing to countenance.
Instead, over the course of more than three hours, a series of unelected and recently de-elected Conservative politicians revealed a long list people and institutions they blamed for the fact that their own brand of ‘Popular Conservatism’ had inexplicably proved to be quite so unpopular.
For the former Conservative minister and current peer, Lord Frost, the answer was quite simple. His party had been compromised by radical leftists pushing a “flabby mishmash of sub-socialist ideas”.
“On virtually every issue we have followed the collectivist Zeitgeist leftwards”, Frost told the room.
His former colleague and surviving Conservative MP Suella Braverman wholeheartedly agreed, insisting via video link from another hard right political conference in Washington, that her party had made the fatal error of trying to “mimic the Labour party”, while refusing to ever mention real Conservative ideals.
“We didn’t mention immigration,” said Braverman, who had mentioned next to nothing else during her time as Home Secretary.”
“We didn’t want to talk about it, we didn’t want to look at it.”
Later, an audience member suggested that this leftist infiltration had extended right into the heart of the Conservative party’s own campaigning machine, warning that Lib Dem sleeper agents must now be expelled from the party’s headquarters.
Seems sorta logical from a conservatives point of view. I am not one.
But it seems rather odd to believe in Conservative ideals and sell something else.
So if you build a political party around conservatism. To the point you name the party the Conservative and Unionist party.
Then it would be odd to lose an election and think the voters are correct to reject conservatism.
I mean If you reword it for labour over the last 14 years. It would only make sense if the Labour party called itself the socialist party.
While I and many would li,ely still vote for it. Changing its policies more to be right wing would be rather hypocritical.
Now if it was the rich thieving arseholes not wanting laws to apply to them party.