• FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sounds like the same argument against banning smoking in pubs, which is probably the single greatest health intervention in the last fifty years and now supported by basically everyone.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Inside is very different to outside where smoke doesnt accumulate. You can instantly smell someone had a ciggarette inside even hours later, outside you cant tell (once the person has left) even a few seconds later.

      • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That’s incredibly subjective, and not true for many. A lot of people can tell if you’ve been smoking outside

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Its incredibly subjective that smoke dissipates far faster outside where there is significant airflow than inside closed rooms?

          Yes your clothes might smell if you’ve been smoking outside, but if you walk away from the spot there isn’t any smoke hanging around for other people to breathe in. That is the difference when it comes to health effects from second hand smoke.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        outside you cant tell even a few seconds later.

        I’ve got bad news for you, smoker…we can tell. You fuckin STINK no matter where you smoke. Your breath, your clothes, your hair…yuck. Everyone knows you took that cigarette break.

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          A) other than a few joints in my 20s I’ve never smoked, dont be an arse and make assumptions about people you dont know.

          B) I really dont care that smokers often stink, I dont live with any. My point was that their cancer causing fumes dont linger outside for me to breathe in so I dont care that they are doing it to themselves. The opposite is true inside where they are affecting me, so I’m glad that’s banned.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Well you specifically mentioned the smell which is what I was referring to

            • Womble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I mentioned the smell merely as a way of showing that smoke fumes linger inside in a way they dont outside.

        • Zombie
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Oh no! Smells! Call the police.

          “Yes, police service please. Somebody was stressed at work and decided to take a break to calm down and in doing so inadvertently made my jumper smelly. Can you arrest them please? They’re still here. They’re behind the bar serving pints to everyone, you can’t miss them, their t-shirt is so pongy, poooooeeeyyyyy. I’ll see you in 5 minutes.”

          I worked in a pub for a few years, do you know how difficult it is to get the plod to show up? Even if there’s two blokes kicking the shit out of each other it can be a task to get them to respond to the call.

          Making it ILLEGAL to smoke outside is ridiculous. Those who say otherwise are far happier with government overreach and authority than they’d otherwise admit.

          Edit: to add, remember when we were told sitting outside kept us safe from covid, an airborne virus, because of the constant airflow? Funny how that doesn’t apply to smoking.

          • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The comparison to COVID is interesting. If people can smell the smoke, they’re literally breathing in the air that the smoker is breathing out, and one can definitely smell smoke from the next table over. Maybe that’s part of why lockdown didn’t work as well as we hoped.

            Also, if you can smell it, it’s doing harm. Second and third hand smoke on your clothing is still real in outdoor spaces, and people should have the freedom to avoid that harm.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            In your experience, do bartenders tend to take their smoke breaks in the outdoor seating area with the patrons? If not then your post is moot - the ban isn’t for employees taking a smoke break out back.