• Shalakushka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh no, my democracy is going to represent the people rather than an arbitrary subset of the people that happen to align with my biases! The horror!

    Democracies should have strong, broad participation. Why would you want a democracy that hears the voice of fewer of its constituents, other than to do things they would never accept given the choice?

    You think any change to the voter base is negative for some reason - it’s not. Some changes make the democracy less representative of the people living in it (e.g., arbitrarily deciding some people shouldn’t be able to vote) while some make the democracy more representative (e.g., removing arbitrary barriers to voting).

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh no, my democracy is going to represent the people rather than an arbitrary subset of the people

      Fair point

      It just surprised me a bit that Labour have come up with this now, after Brexit, so I’m trying to read between the lines and see what motives they might have to do it. As much as I support Labour and broadening the voter base, I fear the ulterior motive here is to defend themselves from competition. If they actually wanted productive, democratic competition, they would adopt PR.

      happen to align with my biases!

      Please don’t assume my biases. It’s not a good look.

      • HumanPenguin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brexit supporters claimed brexit would open the nation to more wide skilled immigration rather then be a racist attempt to stop it.

        So of course that wanted immigration will lead to a community that needs a say in how the nation is run.