• Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          But what would be the point of having a referendum, getting the results and then just saying “oh right, that’s interesting” and doing nothing?

          • frazorth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            19 hours ago

            What would be the point of having a referendum and deciding that 51% was enough to burn it all without a plan?

              • frazorth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I didn’t say ignore the vote. Your reading comprehension is atrocious.

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Let me think… Possibly because it was based on lies, manipulation and the significant part of the UK residents were disenfranchised?

            • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Who was disenfranchised? It was the biggest democratic vote in the UK’s history, if I recall correctly.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    All of the Conservatives who voted, 78 of them, opposed the idea

    I’m mildly surprised by that, since FPTP actively hurt them at the last election.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      It might have lost the party the election

      But the rich party donors don’t actually mind their party losing as long as they also control the second party well enough to avoid regulations, taxes, or any modicum of responsibility towards society.

      FPTP isn’t about which party wins, it’s about reducing the power of the electorate far enough that change only happens with the content of the rich.

    • Rogue
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s only temporary. Once they’ve bribed farage sufficiently he’ll disband the reform party and the tories will return to dominating elections through the corruption of FPTP. The absurd thing is Labour refuse to accept this and will blunder on refusing to accept we need a proportional electoral system

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Labour have just won a 174 seat majority on 34% of the vote with FPTP.

        There would be no benefit to them in changing the system.

        • Rogue
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          In my opinion labour’s victory was due to the utter incompetence of the conservatives and unexpected success of the reform party. I don’t believe these circumstances will be repeated so labour will get demolished as usual in the next election. The same applies to the lib dems getting 70 seats under FPTP. It won’t be repeated so they must work together to repair the damn system

    • mannycalavera
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah but they’d get fucked with PR.

      Labour less so but they would still prefer FPTP over PR for party reasons. And without one or both of these large groups nothing will change. 😞