• EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have said for years I do not trust that woman. She is too powerful and, honestly, I bet she has nukes.

      • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “We’ve got a big surprise for you all today! Everyone look under your seats”

        Audience members find a leaflet and begin reading

        “We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man. A single one of our newly developed atomic bombs is actually the equivalent in explosive power to what 2000 of our giant B-29s can carry on a single mission. This awful fact is one for you to ponder and we solemnly assure you it is grimly accurate…”

      • Rooskie91@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        She’s endorsed multiple on her show selling junk science and grifts. She perpetuates myths about losing weight and health to promote her products. She basically did the same thing on Maui that everyone gets angry at Zuckerberg for doing Kauai, which was buy a fuck ton of land and then kick everyone off of it. She presents like a black girl that made it, but is infact just another billionaire member of the American aristocracy. Is she better than most? Sure, but it’s not hard to be better than people like Trump and Koch.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    210
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fuck Oprah.

    Her sanctimonious bullshit brought us Dr. Oz, Dr. Phil, and Jenny McCarthy.

    Her ‘listening platform’ has probably lead directly to the deaths of tens of thousands of people.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I believe she’s also the largest one of the largest land owners in Maui where many locals are facing homelessness due to the fires.

      Edit: she owns around 1000 acres.

      • BothsidesistFraud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        No. The State of Hawaii is the largest landowner on Maui, followed by the real estate company Alexander and Baldwin. Do not spread misinformation please.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      “But she’s so empowering!” the fans will say, nevermind the fact that she only seems to “empower” fraudsters.

    • IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Would you rather, receive open heart surgery performed by Oz, Phil with Nurse McCarthy, or receive lethal injection administered by Dr Phil?

      This shouldnt be a hard question, but…

      • metallic_substance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah, nah, nah. Easy choice. I’d go with the lethal injection because I think that there’s a much greater chance Phil would fuck up killing someone (easy, all things considered), rather than the three of them succeeding in something difficult. Simply because none of them are qualified to do anything but blather idiocy into a camera

        • Augustiner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Iirc Dr. Oz used to be quite the renowned heart surgeon. Makes it even more tragic that he chose this life as a charlatan giving harmful advice, instead of using his talent for good.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oprah is a bullshit artist. She has always been a bullshit artist and she got rich peddling bullshit. Her efficiency promoting pseudoscience throughout her career makes her a blight on society, forever deserving scorn for the people she helped to hurt. We are collectively dumber because of her efforts, and she gets to live her life lavished by luxury and adulation as a result.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thanks for succinctly and precisely explaining why I really dislike her.

      I’ve tried to explain why to my wife, but I feel like I’ve always missed the mark and she has implied it’s probably a mixture of misogyny and/or racism. Which still may be true I don’t really know. However, next time it comes up, I’ll point out that I dislike her for the same reason I dislike rogan.

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Unfortunately, sexism and racism is so rampant from men (conservatism is ingrained into many men as a form of masculinity) that well-intentioned men who criticize toxic and exploitative capitalist women (esp women of color) are immediately lumped into that group of degenerate men. The reality of it is, Oprah is a toxic influence on women and gets off on creating FOMO among her impressionable fanbase. She created Dr. Oz and Dr. Phil, the former of which has had disastrous effects on women’s health esp nutrition because he’s a quack and pretends to be an expert on all things medical, and the latter of which oversimplifies most psych concepts to the point where laypeople think they’re qualified psychologists now.

      • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        65
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You really didn’t need to admit that you probably don’t like her because she’s a black woman. If you don’t say this to your wife when adding the joe rogan bit, then you’re being dishonest.

        Edit: Look. OP said that. It’s right there in the comment. I’m not making it up. Oprah sucks? Sure. She’s like Joe Rogan? Okay. My wife said my comments are sexist and racist, and it may be true… dude. That’s all I pointed out. Sorry, but that’s not okay. I’m fine with the downvotes, though I’ll make sure to better portray my point next time.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          53
          ·
          10 months ago

          You really didn’t need to admit that you probably don’t like her because she’s a black woman.

          What do you mean? I don’t believe this to be the case, I believe I don’t like her for the same reason I don’t like rogan, and the last I checked he isn’t a black woman. Recognizing that I may have internalized biases that fall in a blind spot of mine is not an admission of anything nor is it something anyone should be shitting on.

          • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            But you did say “my wife thinks my comments have a mix of racism and misogyny, which is still maybe true.” How does that paint a good picture in any way?

            But I stand corrected and I admit I had a knee-jerk reaction.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              How does that paint a good picture in any way?

              I wasn’t trying to paint a good picture, I was being honest.

              • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Then be honest with yourself for once.

                You say:

                I don’t believe this to be the case,

                How do you reconcile that with “maybe I’m being racist and misogynistic”?

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I am being honest with myself: I may have internalized biases that I’m not consciously aware of. There’s nothing to reconcile here as these two statements are not mutually exclusive or even contradictory in any way.

        • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          One of the best ways to come to the conclusion that you need to better yourself in some areas is to be open to the idea you might have a bias.

          But acknowledging you might have a bias does not mean it’s there and you’re OK with it

          And not liking someone who is part of a marginalized group does not always mean a bias either.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    What was that Oprah said about these younger generations not wanting to work for something ?

    “My frustration with young women + young men is that they think success is supposed to happen like - That!”

    that’s her. what a fraud. i take that back. she left the board. i hope that she finds some peace with her body.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      61
      ·
      10 months ago

      Uh, she definitely worked hard. She’s an actual “self made” billionaire. She did it through constantly working in media over decades. Do you think anyone said “let’s just give this young black woman a billion dollars?” She was literally the first black woman to have a billion dollars, so no.

      Her weight has always been an issue, so this is only news to her most rabid fans.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            10 months ago

            And it’s impossible to steal from them as well. You’re just talking back a fraction of what they stole first

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        She’s worked hard. Cool.

        She’s given platform to charlatans. Not cool.

        She’s living in her bubble after getting rich and is unaware of ground realities. Cool.

        She’s criticising average people while living in that bubble. Not cool.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Everybody works hard. If hard work is all it takes to deserve billions, why aren’t all the rest of us billionaires?

        Because she got help, that’s why.

      • GeekFTW@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        She’s an actual “self made” billionaire.

        🤦‍♂️

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The first black woman billionaire was Sheila Johnson.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, she wasn’t. Unless you are double counting her husband’s money. She was married to the founder of BET. If you think they each did equal work for that, the money would be divided evenly.

          When they divorced they had less than a billion each. And their collective wealth only passed $1 billion a few years before Oprah did it on her own. Saying “they were both billionaires” seems wrong.

          If you and your spouse have $1000 total, how much money do you have? The answer is: you have $300 and your spouse has $700 because there’s something amazing that you have to get for the house.

      • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s not self made if she worked her way up. First she had to get a job. Then she had to have someone see something in her to move her up. Then someone had to talk good about her to someone else. Then through the power of networking, she made it to where she is. A lot of success in the entertainment industry is either landing the role that will get you set for life(think Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter), or getting to know people who know people. And for a lot of people, that means other people are helping lift you up.

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    10 months ago

    As someone who is loosing weight it’s basically calories in and calories out without eating over your daily calory budget

    loseit is a good app and will calculate your calory budget for you and can track the foods you eat and add them up

    I feel sorry for you americans though that don’t have the per 100g on your nutritional labels though because serving sizes can be deceptive

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      serving sizes can be deceptive

      The funniest example I’ve seen of this recently is the whipped butter that my parents buy. It has a blurb on the front that says “50% less fat than regular butter per serving”, which is true - because even though the serving sizes are the same (1 tablespoon) the whipped butter is fucking half air.

      • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        See also the “light” version of bottled apple juice, on inspection of the ingredients it’s because they just fucking add water to it and still charge the same price.

    • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Agreed. But we should still acknowledge that losing fat is difficult for multiple reasons. Sure, ultimately it’s basic physics. If you operate on a caloric deficit over a longer period of time you will lose weight. That is true for everybody. But on a personal level it can be quite a challenge to lose fat and not gain it again. There are often life-long habits to overcome, sometimes (mental) health issues to deal with. You must find the time and energy and money to change your eating habits to something healthy. A simple drastic reduction of your caloric intake is unsustainable and unhealthy, you need to come up with a good plan. You need to find time to work out, because that’s also healthy and muscle mass is vital to losing fat. And I sad fat, not weight, because if you gain muscles you will also gain weight, as muscles are heavier than fat. But that’s healthy weight. Anyway, I’m rambling.

      I’m not saying this to discourage anyone, living healthier will benefit you in so many ways. But I feel it’s worth acknowledging that there’s usually more to it than just counting calories.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s just not that easy for some folks. Especially people who have developed eating disorders.

      • x4740N@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I know this might not sound positive but people with eating disorders should try to speak to a therapist about it because eating disorders can end up being horrible for your health

        • Darkblue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Although it is true what you say and I do agree, I also read between your lines that maybe you don’t know how difficult and (life)long that process is.

          An eating disorder is a disease/issue that honestly isn’t solvable, you carry that weak point for the rest of your life and will have to battle it. Which with eating is extra difficult, since you have to eat. You can’t stay sober from food.

          (But maybe I misunderstood your words (being written text without further context). )

          • Wolf_359@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is why I’m not against drugs like Ozempic for those who need it.

            I used a new medication to make me not want opiates. Used it for about two years until I had enough healthy habits in place to actually not want opiates. Been clean for 6 years and off the medication for over a year without issue.

            Never would have gotten clean without it so it makes sense to me how people end up obese.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not about being easy, it’s about being able to measure. I’ve been completely unable to regulate my food intake for a long time until I took it real seriously (therapeutic fasting. It’s a thing, it’s very extreme, if you can avoid it do it) and kind of reset my eating habits. Now that I’m slowly increasing my caloric intake to what someone on the weight I aim to be should consume (2m calories a day, healthy for someone with 90kg), having the pero 100g indication is extremely helpful for me since I can estimate how much stuff is taxing my daily budget, and I’m discovering some incredible cheat foods (stuff I really enjoy eating that fills me and has low calories).

        What I mean to say is that having the per 100g information is very valuable for anyone that cares to control their caloric intake. Sure, you don’t have it in restaurants and stuff but with enough experience you tend to learn to estimate dishes so you can compensate beforehand or afterwards to not exceed your budget.

        Its all about caloric intake, some people have it real hard to keep it under control due to eating disorders or family customs, but it really is just that.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            It should be interpreted: “if there’s any way that you can avoid using this technique/ therapy, then you should absolutely go out of your way to avoid having to use this torture regemin therapy.”

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Sure! As always, food being filling depends a lot on the person same with tastyness. Anyway, one dish I really like is guacamole, it’s usually eaten with bread, and that bad. Recently I’ve taken a liking to eatich raw spinach with some oil (a cheap refillable spray will let you throw just what you need, usually 60kcal are enough to dress it well) and about 125g guacamole which is somewhat around 250kcal from the brand I buy. The guacamole and oil give a lot of flavour to the spinach, which has a strong texture and takes awhile to eat everything. It’s less than 400kcal in total, and quite healthy.

            Instead of buying fruit juices, which even natural ones have quite a lot of sugar and thus calories, I’ve taken a liking to drinking vegetable soups, which basically cost the same in the store and have a fraction of the caloric cost while having quite a lot of vatamins. Again, I personally enjoy it a lot.

            Besides that it’s all about eating stuff I would not usually eat. Lentils, chickpeas and other legumes are pretty good in nutrients and fill you a lot.

            Everything considered, it’s more about not eating an exaggerated amount of food, and the fasting really helped me reset my habits. Before I wouldn’t have considered eating fruit instead some bag fries, but now that it’s been a while that I haven’t eaten fries, I’m slowly getting used to eating healthy stuff since going from zero to vegetables+fruits is incredible.

            To summarize, lightly dressed spinach & guacamole salad and vegetable soups are my “cheat foods”. Food I really enjoy that fills me up with a low caloric intake.

            Edit: forgot about the pear cherry tomatoes, it’s a variety of cherry tomatoes that has more “meat” and is sweeter, but still has fuckall calories so buying a bunch instead of potatoes and eating them all is totally fine.

    • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait… They don’t have that level of detail on the labels?? That’s ridiculous? Serving size is arbitrary nonsense.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t mean this directed at you since you seem to be very helpful. This is more directed at the zero empathy crowd who likes to repeat this equation.

      I always hear “calories in - calories out = deficit”. But it overlooks that “calories out” is a big mystery box. You can kind of estimate it sometimes. But it’s different for every person, and different every day. And it’s over estimated for people who work out, leading to a lot of frustration.

      I like that you actually have follow ups with things that can help. It’s important to have those conversations instead of just pretending it’s simple.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I just ignore any calories from working out, none of the devices that claim to offer this are accurate, if I’m really starving after a hard workout or long walk I’ll indulge a bit and simply note it down as usual, but otherwise I stick to my calorie planning based on metabolic calorie loss only and ignore the additional ones.

    • DeviantOvary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve been reading so much about how simple it is to lose weight, it’s all about caloric deficit. I’ve also been in Hashimoto’s and hypothyroidism communities long enough to know that’s not always true. It’s probably true for healthy individuals, but with Hashi’s and hypothyroidism, metabolism doesn’t work as well, so you can be in caloric deficit and work out, yet still unable to shed the extra weight.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Strictly speaking that’s not really possible. Like, physically. The body’s ATP production has to come from somewhere, and that’s either stuff you ingest or stuff already in your body. Low metabolism just means even fewer calories going in for a deficit.

        Water retention is also “weight gain” but only sort of. It’s certainly a medical issue but most people specifically mean body fat when talking about weight.

    • Mr.Mofu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You now gave me the idea to maybe give these calorie counters a shot. In my appstore it shows up as “Lose It!”, I asume thats the one? Also question, how privacy safe are these?

      • SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not OP but I did. It was crazy good deal, like £1.50 a month when I signed it. It helped me lose 10kgs. I don’t use it anymore but I use the lessons it’s taught me about portion size etc. I’ve lost more weight since, without exercise and I take prednisolone. Well worth the money for me.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    10 months ago

    In a world of constant unjustified hyperbole, Oprah is genuinely the nexus of SOOO much evil through Oz, Phil, John of God, etc.

    What a fucking suck on humanity.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, when it’s a white man he’s evil, when it’s a black woman she’s a victim of the system. We all know.

        • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          No, like an actual victim of abuse autobiographically.

          Abused by her Grandmother physically as a young child, sexually by multiple people when elementary school age. Neglected by her drug-addict mother. Mentally and emotionally by multiple romantic partners.

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Am I missing something? When WW itself has added medications to its offerings, why would this result in Oprah leaving the board? Or are those two things unrelated?

    • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      10 months ago

      For a long time, Weight Watchers has said that if you just follow their points system, the weight will melt off and you won’t need supplements or anything else. When most people think of Weight Watchers, they’re probably not thinking about the weight loss drugs they now support; they’re thinking of the years of points gimmick that make you feel like you can’t lose weight unless you pay $10+/month to see if you can eat that food or not (rather than teaching anyone about calorie intake vs. output).

      Weight Watchers relies on a subscription based model to “save” people from their fatness, and Oprah was the biggest WW pusher. She had tons of money and resources, was even on the board of WW, and still needed medications to manage her weight. I don’t give a fuck, but people who bought into her ads and promos probably feel a little pissed off.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wegovy is fairly new as a weight-loss drug (it’s a rebranded diabetes treatment), but it’s taking the weight-loss world by storm because it actually works.

          In its clinical trial for weight-loss treatment in 2021, they tested it against a placebo and told both groups to combine the meds with lifestyle changes, and over the 68-week trial those on placebos lost an average of under 3% body weight while those on Wegovy lost almost 15%.

    • Synthuir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      1954: Oprah Winfrey is born in Kosciusko, MS, weighing 6 pounds, 11 ounces. Throughout her infancy, she steadily gains weight, a habit that persists throughout her life.

      How brave 😔

    • kase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      […]a poem dedicated to Winfrey, “Water Into Air.”

      “As I lose, I gain,” Angelou said. “I wing home to a place long forgotten. I swell as I recede, taking in all that has come before me. I molt. I shed. I diminish. But I feel no loss for I am free. My song slips its long confinement and joins the celestial roar. I was made of water, now I am air. I lose as I gain, but again I lose. I lose. I lose.”

      And this is why I love the onion.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why is this surprising or even controversial? Weight Watchers bought Sequence whose whole purpose was to fast track access to Wegovy. Seems a little ridiculous to point towards that as the reason for the stock falling. Most likely it was simply because she left the board.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Never been a big fan of Oprah, or anyone who bases their entire career around “Look how generous and righteous I am”, while earning huge profits for doing it. It will never not rub me the wrong way.

    These people may inject some good into the world for a few people, but building your fame and fortune around it is a bit morally fucked.

    • Unlimited_Power@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oprah built her empire on the backs of all the slow adults and little people she victimized during her first few years.

    • Art35ian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “Look how generous and righteous I am”

      Also Drake. Also Shaq.

      Both give away heaps of money… but only in front of heaps of planned cameras rolling.

      That’s not charity. That’s using the poor for PR and clicks for profit, no different from Bum Fights.

      Change my mind.

    • qwrty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      BREAKING NEWS

      In my 25 year career, this is possibly the worst thing I will report…

      Oprah still exists.

      We’ll be back when more information comes out about this horrible situation.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    She’s a terrible spokesperson for WW anyway due to her trademark weight fluctuations over a period of 3-4 decades. Oprah gets fat, she “goes on WW”, writes a book about her experience which is basically a glorified WW commercial. Rinse and repeat. Capitalist scum.