Rishi Sunak has apologised for leaving D-day anniversary events early to take part in a TV interview, admitting it was “a mistake not to stay in France longer”.

The prime minister had been heavily criticised for allowing the foreign secretary, David Cameron, to take his place in the late afternoon ceremony at Omaha beach on Thursday, while he left Normandy to do a prerecorded ITV segment to be broadcast next week.

On Friday, the prime minister said on X: “I care deeply about veterans and have been honoured to represent the UK at a number of events in Portsmouth and France over the past two days and to meet those who fought so bravely.

“After the conclusion of the British event in Normandy, I returned back to the UK. On reflection, it was a mistake not to stay in France longer – and I apologise.”

Conservative activists reacted with fury at the sight of Cameron standing alongside the French, German and US leaders, Emmanuel Macron, Olaf Scholz and Joe Biden, with one saying it had left them questioning whether to “bother to continue campaigning”.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    And now he’s complaining about Labour ‘politicising’ this. He’s a politican, everything he does is politicised!

    EDIT:

    The full quote is just incredible and is some evidence that Sunak might in fact be the stupidest man in the world:

    I also don’t think it’s right to be political in the midst of D-day commemorations. The focus should rightly be on the veterans and their service and sacrifice for our country.

    So why the fuck did you run off and record a political interview in which your refused to apologise for the lie you told about politics for political reasons?

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 days ago

      He’s an absolute imbecile. It’s not even going to go out for like a week, he could have picked any other day to record it on and it would have been fine.

      Now in a week’s time ITV are going to show it and it’s just going to bring it all back up again.

      • JohnSmith
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m sure Sunak is a very intelligent person. You simply don’t get to be a PM by being an imbecile in the low IQ sense of the term. There is abundant evidence that he is a totally useless politician and an incompetent leader. His moral compass, I’m not even going to comment.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          I’m sure Sunak is a very intelligent person.

          I’m sure he was considered to be borderline convenient. I tend to feel that the conspiracies with these sorts of groups isn’t so much a plan for world domination, as it is for basic survival.

          He was the best of a worst bunch. There’s nothing more complicated in it than that.

        • HumanPenguin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          You simply don’t get to be a PM by being an imbecile in the low IQ sense of the term

          He lost to someone who failed to outlast a lettuce. Sorry nope under the current tory party. The ability to talk crap is pretty much all they expect.

          We can only hope your statement applies when a person is required to win an election. But sunak was appointed purely to avoid yet another tory infight over leadership.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 days ago

    Serious unforced error - what were they thinking? Especially as the parties had agreed to suspend campaigning.

    with one saying it had left them questioning whether to “bother to continue campaigning”.

    I’d hate to be the one to break it to them…

  • UKFilmNerd
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 days ago

    Rishi may have the brains to run a company (maybe) but his public interaction of any kind is atrocious. I listened to the full five-minute apology, and it sounded utterly false. Every time he speaks, not just this apology, you can tell it has been scripted, especially when he’s asked a question, and he replies with the identical repetition of something he’s already said.

    The amount of times he said the same sentence about the fact the itinerary was already set weeks ago. So you were always planning to leave early? I hope some evidence turns up to prove that he allegedly wasn’t going to go to France at all. This is what the French government were told a few weeks ago, apparently.

    Finally, don’t make this political!? Too fucking late mate.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      If he was any good as a CEO he’d have a senior role at his in laws company that has a market cap of $75bn as he’d be able to generate billions for them of extra revenue. The fact that he doesn’t speaks volumes about his ability.

    • kralk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      I dunno why but this is my all-time favourite meme template. I also enjoyed “we’ve called an election by mistake!”

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Yeah you really shouldn’t bother continuing to campaign because he is literally the worst possible prime minister you could have picked.

    But he was picked and that’s a conservative problem. That frankly the conservatives deserve.

        • JohnSmith
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 days ago

          I’d say that in itself is more of an achievement than anything else he’s managed as the PM.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Did he achieve literally anything as PM? I know he was going on about that smoking law but did that actually go through.

            I know he legislated that an unsafe country is safe, but given that that’s going to get undone the instant Labour in office I don’t count it. Also it ended up having absolutely zero effect anyway as the only person deported to Rwanda was someone who went voluntarily.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        What I mean though is he was hand-picked by the Tories, it wasn’t as though there was an election where he ended up on top because all the other candidates were not chosen, like Theresa May. He didn’t win by default or anything, they chose him.

        They actually presumably thought about it and decided he was the best option. If that’s what the party thinks is the best option, I think it’s doomed as a political entity. I would not waste my time having anything to do with it.

    • jabjoe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      The party elected Truss. They showed themselves unable to pick a decent leader. So the party machinery stepped in and did a bit better. It shows the state of the party.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    ‘Own goal’ doesn’t even begin to describe it.

    It’s like he got so pissed off with his own party trying to stab him in the back that he’s now doing the political equivalent of running it down.

    Now I really hope the Liberals or Reform UK become the opposition party.

  • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 days ago

    Apparently his itinerary was set “weeks ago”. So he arranged to be recording a TV interview before the election had even been announced…?

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Part to me would think that it was all part of some conspiracy where he knew the election was going to happen already. But that requires a level of competence that frankly he’s not demonstrated.

      I actually genuinely believe that was the date they chose for the interview and it was just going to be some interview and it’s changed into a political appeal one. And no one in his team can add up dates in their head, so it never occurred to anyone that that was a stupid date to pick.

      • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m inclined to agree. There’s no conspiracy, just incompetence. I think also it simply never occurred to Sunak what the optics would be. He only thought in terms of “this event is just me hanging around talking to people, I’ve got much more important stuff to do”, and he just doesn’t understand that talking to people and trying to be a human being is part of the job of prime minister.

        • JohnSmith
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Wast majority of cases are perfectly explained by the fuck-up theory, and it’s hard for me to see how this is any different. That doesn’t make things any better, though. I would absolutely expect the PM and the team around the PM being much, much better. This is a devastating verdict on Sunak’s leadership, as if yet another one was needed.

    • apis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 days ago

      Besides which, D-Day commemorations would have been planned much further back than that, including the attendance of the British PM. That would have been in the diary of No.10 long before Sunak himself took office, with just very fine details to tweak nearer the day.

  • mannycalavera
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    Hopefully this loses him the grey vote. Third place please. Doesn’t even deserve to be in opposition.

  • Baggins@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    Rish! Do us all a favour and just jack in in now. At this point, you’re just a waste of space.

  • JohnSmith
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 days ago

    I thought the picture of Biden, Schroeder, Macron and … the chap from Chipping Norton spoke volumes.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The prime minister had been heavily criticised for allowing the foreign secretary, David Cameron, to take his place in the late afternoon ceremony at Omaha beach on Thursday, while he left Normandy to do a prerecorded ITV segment to be broadcast next week.

    On Friday, the prime minister said on X: “I care deeply about veterans and have been honoured to represent the UK at a number of events in Portsmouth and France over the past two days and to meet those who fought so bravely.

    Conservative activists reacted with fury at the sight of Cameron standing alongside the French, German and US leaders, Emmanuel Macron, Olaf Scholz and Joe Biden, with one saying it had left them questioning whether to “bother to continue campaigning”.

    It was part of a series of pre-recorded ITV interviews with political party leaders that will be broadcast throughout the election campaign – meaning the prime minister could have recorded it at any point in the next four days.

    On Thursday evening, ITV decided to release a short taster clip from the longer interview, in which Sunak was challenged about his tax claims, hoping to attract coverage ahead of Friday night’s televised debate between party representatives.

    A Conservative source played down the diplomatic impact of the prime minister’s absence from the event, as they said Sunak would see Macron, Biden, Scholz and other key leaders at the G7 summit in Puglia, Italy, which starts next Thursday.


    The original article contains 719 words, the summary contains 241 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • jobby@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    17 days ago

    He’s certainly got his priorities.

    To be fair, he wouldn’t have lost any ancestors in D-Day.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 days ago

      Even rich people died on D-Day. Not as many as the poor lads thrown into the meat grinder but the officer class got hit too.

      • jobby@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m afraid I’m referring to his Indian heritage. Although, to be fair, I have not done the research to find out whether his grandparents / greats were in the UK at the time or indeed participated in WWII in Europe.

        • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 days ago

          He is of Punjabi descent and the Indian Army contributed in a major way during WW2 - it’s often aid that we’d have lost without them. The bulk fought the Japanese (which include some huge brutal battles - the Stalingrad of the East) but they were active in the European, North African and Pacific theatres of war.

          There were 300 Indian soldiers evacuated from Dunkirk, almost all Muslims from the Punjab. It became an issue when Christopher Nolan released his film about it and left them out, despite them being evacuated from the pier in the film.

          Sepoy Kamal Ram of the 8th Punjab Regiment received the Victoria Cross for his bravery in the push on Monte Cassino. One of 31 issued to Indians in WW2, a number handed out for the Italian campaign (with the Ghurka Rifles and Mahratta Light Infantry getting a few each).

          I couldn’t find anything on his actual ancestors being involved (some seem to have been in East Africa at the time) but with such a large mobilisation of Indian troops in WW2, he will have had relatives involved in the conflict.

          • jobby@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Great, thank you. Good to know. I’ll file that away in the old bonce.

            I’ll withdraw my statement on the off chance that his family did in fact take part.

            He’s still an entitled twat and utterly out of touch, but that’s another argument.

      • jobby@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yeah I get that the sentiment appears to sail rather close to the wind, and I’m not racist.

      • jobby@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 days ago

        I merely think he may not have as deeply-felt reverent ideas about the day as other Brits.

        No disrespect to his heritage, but it may not ring quite the same for him.